Dillingham Construction, N.A. v. Nadel Partnership, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARON, J.
Appellant the Nadel Partnership, Inc. (Nadel), an architecture firm, was found by a jury to be 10 percent liable for a discrete set of defects in a construction project which would cost $3,437,494 to repair. The cost of overall repairs to the project was estimated at up to $51 million by the plaintiff, who settled for a total of approximately $15 million paid by other defendants. On a cross-claim for indemnity brought by one of the settling defendants, the trial court allowed the jury to decide how much of the unallocated lump-sum settlement should be attributed to the defects…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jhaveri v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- McMillin Companies, LLC v. American Safety Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ehret v. Congoleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Badr v. City of San RamonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.