Legal Opinion

Dillingham Construction, N.A. v. Nadel Partnership, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1998No. B111638PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARON, J.

Appellant the Nadel Partnership, Inc. (Nadel), an architecture firm, was found by a jury to be 10 percent liable for a discrete set of defects in a construction project which would cost $3,437,494 to repair. The cost of overall repairs to the project was estimated at up to $51 million by the plaintiff, who settled for a total of approximately $15 million paid by other defendants. On a cross-claim for indemnity brought by one of the settling defendants, the trial court allowed the jury to decide how much of the unallocated lump-sum settlement should be attributed to the defects…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Isaacson v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jhaveri v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. McMillin Companies, LLC v. American Safety Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Ehret v. Congoleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Badr v. City of San RamonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API