Legal Opinion

A.H. v. Ahmad S. Khalifa

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 27, 2025No. 2:22-cv-07148Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A.H., et al., 2:22-cv-07148-DSF-PVCx Plaintiffs, Order DENYING Motion to v. Remand (Dkt. 47) AHMAD KHALIFA, M.D., et al., Defendants. The United States (the government) has moved to remand this action. The government argues that the removing defendants, Ahmad Khalifa, M.D., Borzouyeh Poursharif, M.D., and Eisner Pediatric and Family Medical Center (Eisner Defendants) are not entitled to coverage under 42 U.S.C. § 233(a) because the incidents at issue in this case arise out of work that the Eisner Defendants did on behalf of a non-…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. Richford Health Ctr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API