Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1912No. 4011Published

Accusation of carrying pistol; from city court of Ocilla — Judge Oxford. January 16, 1912. The plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of the act of 1910 as to carrying a pistol without a license.

Read the full summary

Accusation of carrying pistol; from city court of Ocilla — Judge Oxford. January 16, 1912. The plaintiff in error was convicted of a violation of the act of 1910 as to carrying a pistol without a license. His motion for a new trial, the refusal of which is assigned as error, alleged that .the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and that the court erred in refusing written requests to charge the jury as follows: “If you believe, from the evidence and the defendant’s statement, that the defendant, as he claims, went to see his son in another county, and found the son in possession of…

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The decision in this case is controlled by the ruling of this court in Cheney v. State, 10 Ga. App. 451 (73 S. E. 617).

Judgment affirmed.

Newbern & Meeks, for plaintiff in error. H. J. Quincey, solicitor, contra.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cheney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API