Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hiatt
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1994No. 20379Published
1Opinion of the Court
872 P.2d 879 (1994)
117 N.M. 461
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James A. HIATT and Laurel Ann Hiatt, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 20379.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
April 6, 1994.
Tucker Law Firm, P.C., Steven L. Tucker, Santa Fe, for defendants-appellants.
Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Robert H. Clark, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Defendants-Appellants, James A. Hiatt and Laurel Ann Hiatt (the Hiatts), appeal the denial of their motion to set aside a default judgment entered against them. The Hiatts argued to the trial court that the judgment should…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.