Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 29, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2012-208626; No. 5337Published

1DissentGeathers, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, the PCR court erred as a matter of law when it denied PCR.

“It is well established that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the criminal prosecution of a defendant who is not competent to stand trial.” Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 439, 112 S.Ct. 2572, 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992). “This right cannot be waived by a guilty plea. The test of competency to enter a plea is the same as required to stand trial.” Jeter v. State, 308 S.C. 230, 232, 417 S.E.2d 594, 595-96 (1992) (citation omitted). “This Court has held that to be competent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Terry Allen Bouchillon v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. LambertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Hall v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Jeter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API