Legal Opinion

State v. Gatcomb

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 26, 1978PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

George F. Gatcomb, Jr., was indicted for violating 17 M.R.S.A. § 2656 (Assault with Intent to Kill). 1

On May 6, 1976 (after the effective date of the Maine Criminal Code), Gatcomb is alleged in a three-count indictment to have violated 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (Burglary), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (Theft), and 17-A M.R.S.A. § 209 (Criminal Threatening with a Dangerous Weapon). Ultimately the four criminal charges were consolidated, Gat-comb waived trial by jury, and after pleading “not guilty and not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect” to each of the charges, trial was had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. PomerleauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. State v. BuzynskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Neelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. State v. CondonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. State of Maine v. Mark P. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API