Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 17, 2016No. 16-0068/NAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge STUCKY

delivered the opinion of the Court. 1

In this case, at Appellee’s request, the military judge made special findings in returning his guilty verdict. On review, the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) found Appellee’s convictions factually insufficient, set aside the findings and sentence, and dismissed the charges and specifications with prejudice. The Judge Advocate General of the Navy (JAG) certified the case for review of two issues: (1) whether the-CCA failed to conduct a complete review under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 10…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. McCraryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  4. United States v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  5. United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ShermotU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  2. United States v. GilpinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  3. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
  4. United States v. HutchinsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API