Legal Opinion

Jon Robert Perroton v. W. Seifert, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1994No. 91-56409Published

1Opinion of the Court

15 F.3d 1088

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Jon Robert PERROTON, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

W. SEIFERT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 91-56409.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 1993.*

Decided Jan. 6, 1994.

Before: SNEED, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Jon Robert Perroton, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Jesse Acosta-Huerta v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Men's ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API