Legal Opinion

McINTOSH v. Pacific Holding Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 8, 1998No. 4:CV95-3123PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

This case is before me upon remand from the Court of Appeals. McIntosh v. Pacific Holding Company, 120 F.3d 911, 912 (8th Cir.1997) (an ERISA plan was silent on the issue of attorney fees for plan beneficiaries who sue third party tortfeasor's when the plan is also subrogated to the recovery of the beneficiary; holding that “federal common law gives an action for attorney’s fees in circumstances like the present ones (sic), and in an amount equal to ‘the value of the [the claimant’s] legal services to the plan;’” remanding for a determination of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. McIntosh v. Pacific Holding Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
  3. McINTOSH v. PACIFIC HOLDING COMPANYCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Mcintosh v. Pacific Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. White v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API