Legal Opinion

State v. Wells

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Wallace, J.

The indictment is for a violation of chapter 76, Laws 1897, entitled, “ An act in relation to hawkers and peddlers.” Section 1 provides that “ No person shall do any business as a hawker or peddler, or go about from town to town, or from place to place in the same town, exposing for sale or selling any goods, wares, or merchandise,” except certain kinds of property therein named, without a license. It is apparent from the title of the act and from its terms that it was designed to affect hawkers and peddlers, and to regulate their business. The language used expresses the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. City of Davenport v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. City of Stuart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TuffsMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Appeal of John Hancock Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. City of Wausau v. HeidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. DressnerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API