Universal Transport & Distributing Co. v. Cantu
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motions for Certiorari and to Reinstate Mandamus Proceeding and Issue Mandamus.
The petition for mandamus and motion for rehearing thereof have been heretofore dismissed by this court upon the ground that the transcript, or motion to extend the time for filing the same, had not been timely filed in this court, and that this court therefore had no jurisdiction of the cause.
This action was taken upon the erroneous assumption that the matter should be governed by the provisions of article 1839, as amended by Acts 43d Leg., c. 67 (Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 1839), requiring an appellant to file…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Charles Scribner's Sons v. S.M.N. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Wells v. DriskellTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Patrick v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- McKenzie Const. Co. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.