Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Rhinehart

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 3, 1993No. 2007Published

1DissentLittlejohn, Acting Judge

Originally the writing of the opinion in this case fell to me. I proposed to “Affirm in Part; Reverse in Part; and Remand.” A majority of the panel having now taken a contrary view, I file my proposed opinion (with minor modifications) as my dissent.

Defendant, Charles Rhinehart, pled guilty to receiving stolen goods. He was sentenced to four years in prison, suspended on time served and was ordered to serve two years probation and complete two hundred hours of public service.

At the plea hearing, the solicitor stated that no restitution *40was sought inasmuch as the property had been recovered.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BynesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. FussellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API