Heidbreder v. Heidbreder
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge.
¶ 1 Jodi Heidbreder (“Mother”) appeals from the superior court’s order modifying the child support award paid to her by Gregg Heidbreder (“Father”). We hold that pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 25-403.09(A) (2007), the court properly addressed child support when it modified the parties’ custody orders. However, we vacate the court’s child support modification order and remand for a hearing and/or further briefing because entry of the modification order under the circumstances of this case deprived Mother of her due process right to adequate notice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlton v. EmhardtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Bonito Partners, LLC v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Randolph v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Wallace v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Volk v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Fuess v. FuessCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Kittel v. KittelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Oliveira v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.