Garner & Glover Co. v. Barrett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Boggs, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, Garner and Glover Company (“Garner”), an insurance producer, contends it was entitled to summary judgment in its favor because (1) it owed no duty to notify an excess insurance carrier of a claim on behalf of an additional insured, Atlanta Gas Light Company (“AGL”); and (2) the underlying plaintiffs cannot file a direct action against it based upon a settlement with and assignment from AGL. For the reasons explained below, we reverse.
“On appeal from the grant or denial of summary judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review.” (Citation omitted.)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Rasnick v. Krishna Hospitality, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Layfield v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Barrett v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chaitram v. ILG Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- Ejiowhor v. ILG Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- Heath v. ILG Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- Hillard v. ILG Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
- Lucky Capital Management, LLC v. Miller & Martin, PLLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.