Legal Opinion

Saucier v. Jenkins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1963No. 982Published

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellees seek recovery respectively for personal injuries sustained by Saucier and by North1 British and Mercantile Insurance Company, his subrogated insurer, for property damage resulting from an intersectional collision in New Orleans. Reference to plaintiff in the singular will be to Saucier.

Defendants are the taxicab owner (Jenkins), her driver (Brousseau), and the taxicab insurer, Nola Cabs, Inc., under Municipal Ord. No. 1004, M.C.S., § 12:157, of New Orleans. Reference to Defendant in the singular will be to the taxicab driver (Brousseau).

The intersection is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aime v. Nola Cabs, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Rogillio v. ParentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Butler v. Houma Ice Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API