Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Public Works

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rale that the Camden Horse Railroad Company show cause in the matter of contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

The Camden Horse Railroad Company was incorporated by a charter granted in 1866. Pamph. L.,p. 640. Supplements to its charter were passed in 1868 (Pamph. L., p. 640) and in 1872. Pamph. L., p. 512. The company, by its charter, was a horse railroad company, having its location in the city of Camden. By its charter it had no power to use electricity as the propelling power of its cars'. Such authority could only be obtained in conformity with the provisions of the act of 1886. Rev. Sup., p. 369, § 30. And by an act approved March 9th, 1893 (Gen:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carr v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
  3. Barrett v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. United Factory Outlet, Inc. v. Jay's Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API