Legal Opinion

State v. Ching

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1980No. 7169, 7170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,.

Plaintiff-appellee, State of Hawaii (hereinafter “State”), brought an action against defendants-appellants, Dick Ching and Ryu International, Inc. (hereinafter “appellants”), in the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii, charging them with operating a prohibited use within a street yard setback in violation of Ordinance 4573 § IV(C) of the City and County of Honolulu, entitled: “A Bill For an Ordinance to Establish ‘The Waikiki Special Design District’ (WSDD).” At the conclusion of the trial on September 15, 1978, the District Court rendered a judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. State v. Fair Lawn Service Center, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. State v. HannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Marsland v. PangHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Olinyk v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API