Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Winter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The statements which appellant admits she made to respondent in open court were sufficient to warrant an adjudication that her conduct was contemptuous. However, in view of the fact that such statements were provoked by the court and that appellant offered an apology, the punishment imposed should have been limited to a censure.

It is not necessary to pass on the other questions raised.

*296The order appealed from should be modified by granting the motion to the extent of limiting the punishment to a censure and vacating the commitment, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Borden v. TobiasNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Siegel v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API