Amoco Production Co. v. Douglas Energy Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
This case is presently before the court for consideration of Amoco’s motions for summary judgment, to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim and for a ruling on the burden of proof. The court has reviewed the record including the voluminous memoranda presented in support of the various motions and has heard oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the court is persuaded the motion for summary judgment should be denied and the motion to dismiss should be granted.
The net result of the ruling concerning the burden of proof proposed by Amoco would be to deny…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davies Warehouse Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Union CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Thomas Well Service, Inc. v. Williams Natural Gas Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Oliver v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
- American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Southroads, L.L.C.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Lewis v. KANSAS PRODUCTION CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.