Matarranz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtCortinas, J.
After a jury trial, the Defendant, Rafael Matarranz, was found guilty of the first-degree murder and burglary of Lidia *535Giangrande. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the trial court erred in its denying a challenge for cause against prospective juror Ceballos. After review of the record under the applicable standard of review, we affirm.
During voir dire, the following exchange took place:
THE COURT: Ms. Ceballos, I wanted to follow-up with you.
You had answered a question about the fact that this is a burglary case and it had to do with whether or not you thought you could be a fair juror in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Busby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matarranz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Coe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Mans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011