Legal Opinion

Philip Apsey v. Chester Township, OH

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2015No. 14-3875UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Officers Matthew Brickman and Todd Pocek bring this interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court denying them qualified immunity on plaintiff Philip Apsey’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims of false arrest and malicious prosecution. We REVERSE the district court because the undisputed facts show probable cause existed to arrest and prosecute Apsey and REMAND for consideration of the stayed state law civil conspiracy claim.

I. Background

On July 13, 2010, Officers Brickman and Pocek were dispatched to the intersection of Route 306 and Cedar Road, driving in separate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sykes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Miller v. Sanilac CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Stemler v. City of FlorenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Brown v. Wyoming, City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. Dawn Alexander v. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Gibson v. LudwigDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. Gover v. DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API