Legal Opinion

Page v. St. Lawrence Condensed Milk Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1925Published

1Per curiam

It was held at Special Term and we understand it to be the contention of the plaintiff that the complaint sets forth a cause of action at law. Judgment, however, is demanded not for legal but for equitable relief. This is a defect which if objection thereto is properly made before answer, as it is in this case, requires a dismissal of the complaint. (Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 135 App. Div. 805; affd., 199 N. Y. 536; Chadbourne v. Mayer, 207 App. Div. 754; Spring v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ins. Co., 183 id. 134.) The case of Sims v. Farson (157 App. Div. 38), a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Sims v. FarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Chadbourne v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API