Legal Opinion

Jacob v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1938No. Appeal, 98PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The present action of trespass was brought by the parents as next friends, and in their own right, to recover for injuries to their minor son. The appeal is from the refusal to take off a compulsory nonsuit.

The door leading into the shower room from the swimming pool maintained by the City of Pittsburgh on Paulson Avenue is of heavy steel construction and not equipped with any automatic closing device. The minor plaintiff, a boy of nine years, was about to enter the shower room from the pool when the door, already closing towards him, was slammed shut by boys who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. L'Hommedieu v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Polis v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Wood v. P.R.R. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heps v. Burdine's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Hammontree v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Hartman v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Dworkin v. San Juan Intercontinental Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964
  5. McCallum ex rel. McCallum v. BrodskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API