Legal Opinion

Green v. Meadows

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 21, 1975No. 16318PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for damages for malicious prosecution. The only questions before us under the mandate of the Supreme Court relate to the excessiveness of the damages allowed by the jury. See Green v. Meadows, 517 S.W.2d 799 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston [1st Dist.], 1974); Meadows v. Green, 524 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.1975).

The appellants, James A. Green, Jr. & Company and James A. Green, Jr., have filed a brief for the consideration of this court since the case was remanded. The first point of error presented was the 21st point of their original brief which they assert…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wilson v. Freeman, ReceiverTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Meadows v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Green v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Stein v. GreenebaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tidelands Automobile Club v. Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
  2. Marathon Oil Co. v. Salazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Hicks v. Ricardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Thomas v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Walker v. Ricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API