Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hartman v. Casteel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1984No. 13122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Presiding Judge.

By this original proceeding in prohibition, the petitioner seeks to stay the enforcement of a writ of possession for real property and for damages of $200. A preliminary order was issued. The matter is for final determination upon an amended petition, the answer thereto, and a multitude of exhibits incorporated in those pleadings. The following is a summary of the facts established by that record.

The controversy has its origin in a “Contract for Deed” entered into by Frankie McFadden as vendor and Lawrence Leslie Hartman and Debra Sue Hartman, his wife, as vendees.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies v. C.F. Murphy & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Berbiglia, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. In Re Marriage of HaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West County Care Center, Inc. v. Missouri Health Facilities Review CommitteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. J.E. Dunn Construction Co. v. Fairness in Construction Board of the City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. West County Care Center, Inc. v. Missouri Health Facilities Review CommitteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API