Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Edward & John Burke, Ltd. v. O'Donnel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Certiorari proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtNewburger, J.

In this proceeding the only question presented is whether debts due relator on open accounts for imported goods sold in original packages are taxable. It has been held that open accounts of a foreign corporation form a part of the working capital, and are, therefore, subject to taxation. See People ex rel. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Barker, 157 N. Y. 159; People ex rel. Crane Co. v. Feitner, 49 App. Div. 108. In another proceeding brought by this relator to review the assessment against it for the year 1903 the Court of Appeals (People ex rel. Burke v. Wells, 184 N. Y. 275) held that “Bills…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Armstrong Cork Co. v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. People Ex Rel. Edward & John Burke, Ltd. v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. People ex rel. Crane Co. v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samuelson v. MayerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API