Legal Opinion

R. B. Morris, Doing Business as Morris and Lowther, H. M. Hewitt and Lew Nunamaker, Etc. v. William Duby, H. B. Van Duzer, and W. H. Malone, Etc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 11, 1926No. 372Published

1Opinion of the Court

273 U.S. 641

47 S.Ct. 109

71 L.Ed. 818

R. B. MORRIS, doing business as Morris and Lowther, H. M. Hewitt and Lew Nunamaker, etc., et al., appellants,

v.

William DUBY, H. B. Van Duzer, and W. H. Malone, etc.*

No. 372.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 29, 1926

1

Messrs. W. R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewing, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

2

Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, of Salem, Or., for appellees.

3

It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon, in this cause, be, and the same is hereby, vacated without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buchhalter v. SolomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API