Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Sapritch

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1940No. Civ. 6336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

Appellant commenced this action for the purpose of compelling respondents to specifically perform the covenants contained in a deed of trust executed by them in his favor. Respondents filed a cross-complaint far damages arising out of the alleged violation of an escrow agreement by appellant. The trial court found against appellant upon his complaint and in favor of respondents upon their cross-complaint. Judgment was entered in favor of respondents, Krekor H. Sapritch and Takoohie K. Sapritch in the sum of $1500, and in favor of respondent Armenia Ruth Sapritch in the sum of $1,000. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ray Thomas, Inc. v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fish v. FleishmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hines v. LukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Ninety Nine Investment, Ltd. v. Overseas Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Compania Constructora Bechtel-McCone v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Reyes v. Carehouse Healthcare Center CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API