Legal Opinion

Olson v. Molland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1930No. 28,042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff had a verdict, but on respondent’s motion the court ordered judgment in her favor notwithstanding the verdict. From the judgment so entered plaintiff appeals.

The action was for a libel contained in a letter written by respondent and mailed to plaintiff. Admittedly the letter libeled plaintiff; but the ground upon which the court vacated the verdict and ordered judgment is that respondent did not publish the libel.

The facts as testified to by plaintiff are these: She received .the letter by mail, opened and read it, then placed it in a drawer with a letter received the same day from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hedgepeth Ex Rel. Hedgepeth v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rumney v. WorthleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Allen v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  4. Kramer v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Seip v. DeshlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frankson v. Design Space InternationalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Frankson v. Design Space InternationalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API