Legal Opinion

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr v. Rob MacWhorter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2015No. 13-35453PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center (“KS Wild”) challenges the district court’s dismissal of its claim against the U.S. Forest Service for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court concluded that KS Wild’s notice of intent to sue under the Endangered Species Act was deficient. For the reasons that follow, we disagree.

I. Background

Under the citizen suit provision of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), a private citizen may bring suit to remedy a violation of the Act, provided that it gives written notice of the alleged violation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Natural Resources Defense Council San Diego Baykeeper, Kenneth J. Moser v. Southwest Marine, Inc.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Alliance v. Cruise Terminals of America, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  2. Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. Cascadia Wildlands v. Scott Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Wildlands v. Scott Timber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
  5. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API