Legal Opinion
City of Santa Fe v. Hernandez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1982No. 13854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
This workmen’s compensation case arises out of a wrongful death action against the personal representative of the estate of Santiago D. Salazar (Salazar), and the City of Santa Fe (City). Salazar’s personal representative filed a workmen’s compensation action against the City and Western Insurance Company which was severed from other claims for purposes of trial. The trial court granted the City summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. We granted certiorari and reverse the Court of Appeals and the trial court.
Salazar was employed by the City.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Rumple v. Henry H. Meyer Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Carter v. Burn Construction Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Department v. BostonWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Anchorage Roofing Co., Inc. v. GonzalesAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ovecka v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Salazar Ex Rel. Estate of Salazar v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Armenta v. A.S. Horner, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- City of Santa Fe v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Salazar Ex Rel. Estate of Salazar v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985