Legal Opinion · Dissent

Melnick v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1938No. 14,316Published

1DissentJustice Bouck

For a proper understanding of the case, it behooves us to supplement the somewhat meager statement of facts in the opinion of the court. The written stipulation in evidence here, introduced by the plaintiff Bowman, which the opinion correctly declares to have been properly admitted, seems conclusive on certain vital issues of fact that call for judgment in favor of the Melnicks.

By this stipulation it is expressly conceded (1) that at the time of the sale by the Melnicks to the Grossmans all of the debts of the California Meat Company were paid, and it had no outstanding obligations except the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wellington v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. Bowman v. MelnickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API