Legal Opinion

Rohring v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1995No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Boehm, J.

We are again called upon to construe the language in CPLR article 50-B (see, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 192 AD2d 228, affd 84 NY2d 60). This time the question concerns the requirements of the annuity contract to be posted as security pursuant to CPLR 5042 and 5043.

In his Labor Law § 240 action, Eric Rohring (plaintiff), was awarded damages of $2,501,311 and, after an article 50-B hearing, Supreme Court entered a structured judgment for the payment of periodic installments. We modified the judgment and the Court of Appeals affirmed (Rohring v City of Niagara…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. New York Post Corp. v. LeibowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Lanz v. FeolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allison v. Erie County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API