Department of Labor & Industries v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
For disciplinary reasons, the Department of Corrections assigned Charles Johnson to stay at home and perform no departmental work during his normal working hours. During this time, Johnson amputated three fingers while working on a personal project at his workbench. Johnson was awarded worker’s compensation, but the Department challenged the award. The trial court reversed, finding that Johnson was not acting in the *277course of his employment. We agree that Johnson was not acting in the course of his employment and, therefore, affirm.
FACTS
Charles Johnson was employed as a Corrections Officer at…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Lunz v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Gordon v. Arden Farms Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Tipsword v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shelton v. Azar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Ackley-Bell v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- BALL-FOSTER GLASS CONT. CO. v. GiovanelliWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Cochran Elec. Co. v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Cochran Electric Co. v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.