Legal Opinion

Willard State Bank v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1922No. 23,813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action by a bank against the payee and endorser of a promissory note. Defendant’s demurrer to the bank’s evidence'was sustained for the reasons given by the trial court—

“That the evidence fails to show that any notice was given to Clark [defendant] of the [maker’s] failure to pay the note or demand made on the maker or notice to that effect given to Clark.”

Defendant moves to dismiss this appeal because no transcript was made or filed in the district court. What purports to be an abstract is submitted by plaintiff and a transcript…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Lawrence v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Black Hardware Co. v. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Midwest Reserve Trust Co. v. Pioneer Cattle Loan Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Sentney v. Central Cattle Loan Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API