Legal Opinion

Pappalardo v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for slander and tortious interference with a contract, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Buell, J.), dated October 27,1983, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment as to the slander cause of action.

Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted in its entirety (see, Pappalardo v Meisel, 112 AD2d 277). Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Huth v. Allied Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Milam v. HerrlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Timashpolsky v. State University of New York Health Science CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Judith M. v. Sisters of Charity HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Catlyn v. Hotel & 33 Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API