Legal Opinion

ACA Galleries, Inc. v. Joseph A. Kinney

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 15, 2014No. 13-1099-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

13‐1099‐cv ACA Galleries, Inc. v. Joseph A. Kinney UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gould v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Lederman v. New York City Department of Parks & RecreationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. P.K. Development, Inc. v. Elvem Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Rose Inn of Ithaca, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API