Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. Lampkin
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, J.,
for the Court.
¶ 1. This case addresses the valuation of a corporation and the related award of damages when one of the corporation’s two shareholders dies and the remaining shareholder begins a new corporation to operate the same .rock-supply business. In the present case, Limestone Prpducts Incorporated had only two shareholders, Ronnie Lampkin and J.O. Smith Jr. Prior to Smith’s death, Limestone operated for ten years with a line of credit.personally guaranteed by both shareholders. However, upon Smith’s death, his estate (the Estate) refused Lampkin’s request to extend a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Biglane v. Under the Hill Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Lovett v. EL Garner, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. LampkinMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. LampkinMississippi Supreme Court · 2017