Legal Opinion

Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. Lampkin

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 16, 2014No. 2013-CA-00554-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. This case addresses the valuation of a corporation and the related award of damages when one of the corporation’s two shareholders dies and the remaining shareholder begins a new corporation to operate the same .rock-supply business. In the present case, Limestone Prpducts Incorporated had only two shareholders, Ronnie Lampkin and J.O. Smith Jr. Prior to Smith’s death, Limestone operated for ten years with a line of credit.personally guaranteed by both shareholders. However, upon Smith’s death, his estate (the Estate) refused Lampkin’s request to extend a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Biglane v. Under the Hill Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lovett v. EL Garner, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. LampkinMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ernest Lane, III v. Ronald D. LampkinMississippi Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API