Katzen v. State

Appellant appeals from the judgment, which followed the finding of the court, that he was guilty of having received stolen goods, as charged in the indictment against him, and assigns as error, the action of the trial court in overruling his motion to quash the indictment, for the reason: “That said indictment does not show that the grand jurors of Marion county were duly sworn and impaneled.”

Appellant, by his brief, very clearly states the question before this court to be decided, viz.: “The question before this court for decision is whether or not in a criminal case the record must show,…