Legal Opinion · Dissent

Newton v. Altheimer

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1926Published

1DissentHart, J.

If the acts of the Legislature under which the rural improvement districts in question were created are a valid and constitutional exercise of legislative power, Judge Wood and myself concede that the writ of mandamus was properly granted by the circuit court, and that its order should be affirmed. While conceding legislative power over the subject-matter of road improvement districts, we deny that it has been constitutionally exercised upon several grounds, and, if we are correct in this, the writ should not have been issued. As said by Chief Justice Puller, “mandamus lies to compel a party…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boyd v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. O'BRIEN v. WheelockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. EnochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  5. Road Improvement District No. 1 v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API