Legal Opinion

David D. Barany v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2016No. 17A04-1510-CR-1734PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAY, Judge.

[1] David D. Barany appeals the trial court’s denial of his request to return the firearm used in the commission of the crime of which he was convicted. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] In 2006, a trial court found Barany guilty of murder and sentenced him to fifty years. 1 During the trial, four weapons were introduced into evidence. On September 10, 2014, Barany asked that a “Bushmaster assault Rifle ... Beretta handgun ... [and] .22 Mag North American Arms Block powder revolver,” (App. at 18) (capitalization errors in original), be returned to his mother, Jan Barany.

[3]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith & Wesson Corp. v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Sinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Merlington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darnell Cleveland v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Marques D. Trice v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Jonathan Kent Roy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API