Legal Opinion

Murphy v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1936No. 31,056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devaney, Chief Justice.

Action to recover sum alleged to be due as balance of commissions for finding purchasers for certain real estate owned by defendant.

In the latter part of September, 1929, plaintiff, H. J. Murphy, banker in Wilmont, Minnesota, received from Annis & Rohling Company, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, farm loan bankers, a circular letter listing for sale two farms located near Wilmont. Both of these farms were owned by the defendant, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. About that time plaintiff talked with Rohling, agent of the defendant, over the telephone and was promised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appleby v. DysingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diffenderfer v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  2. Lidstrom v. MundahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API