Legal Opinion

United States v. Ward

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 23, 1982No. SPCM 16119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FULTON, Senior Judge:

The issue before us is whether appellant’s plea of guilty to a charge of unlawfully opening mail matter was improvident because of the existence of a defense of involuntary intoxication.

Appellant was charged with violating Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976), by “unlawfully openpng] certain mail matter, to wit: letters addressed to certain other members of Company A, US Army Personnel Control Facility .. . Fort Dix, New Jersey, which said letters were then in the mail room of said unit before said letters were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. City of Minneapolis v. AltimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. AlieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Cribb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Commonwealth v. McAlisterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HenslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. HenslerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API