United States v. Ward
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULTON, Senior Judge:
The issue before us is whether appellant’s plea of guilty to a charge of unlawfully opening mail matter was improvident because of the existence of a defense of involuntary intoxication.
Appellant was charged with violating Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976), by “unlawfully openpng] certain mail matter, to wit: letters addressed to certain other members of Company A, US Army Personnel Control Facility .. . Fort Dix, New Jersey, which said letters were then in the mail room of said unit before said letters were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- City of Minneapolis v. AltimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. AlieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Cribb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Commonwealth v. McAlisterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HenslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HenslerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994