Crosman Corp. v. Millender

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

This case comes to us on interlocutory appeal. Crosman Corporation (“Crosman”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss Donald L. and Susan K. Millender’s amended complaint adding Cros-man as a defendant. Crosman raises one issue which we restate as whether the trial court erroneously denied Crosman’s motion to dismiss on the grounds that the Millen-ders’ amended complaint related back to their original complaint under Ind. Trial Rule 15(C). We reverse.

The facts most favorable to the judgment follow. On May 28, 1996, the Millender’s filed a…