Legal Opinion
Buras v. Schultz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 2001No. 2000-CA-1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORBATY, Judge.
In this appeal, defendants Darryl M. Schultz1 et al. contend that the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Ralph Buras. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff Ralph Buras was employed as one of two court reporters for Section “A” of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court from July 1986 to November 1993. In accordance with La. R.S. 13:1373, he was paid a regular monthly salary for recording all proceedings. He also received payment from the requesting party for transcripts he prepared. Compensation for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Hayes v. AutinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Washington v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Acme Window Cleaners, Inc. v. NATAL CONST. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buras v. SchultzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lee & Perles, L.L.P. Formerly Known as Lee, Futrell & Perles, L.L.P., Gary A. Lee and Richard M. Perles v. Resolute Management, Inc., Onebeacon America Insurance Company, Lamorak Insurance Company, Formerly Known as and/or Successor to Onebeacon America Insurance Company and Commercial Union Insurance Company, Taylor Wellons, Politz & Duhe, Plc and Samuel M. Rosamond, IIILouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024