Eastland County v. Davisson

The writer concurred in the original opinion filed in this court on the- day of-, 1926, being then of the opinion that the testimony of Davisson and Starnes was admissible.

Appellant has filed-a very able motion for rehearing, raising the question as to the sufficiency of the testimony upon which the verdict was based, and the writer regrets that he cannot agree with the majority of the court holding that the evidence was sufficient and thereby overruling appellant’s motion for rehearing.

The writer regrets very much to file a dissenting opinion .at this time, but, being so thoroughly convinced…