Legal Opinion

PHILIP H. BERGER v. COPELAND CORPORATION, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2016No. SD34193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

Assessing damages at $5 million actual and $23 million punitive, jurors found for Philip Berger against his employer Copeland Corporation on workplace liability claims for exposure to contaminated metalworking fluids. 1 Upon Copeland’s motion, the trial court ordered a new trial “because this Court erred in submitting Instructions 6 and 10,” respectively a negligence verdict director and a non-MAI inference instruction.

Berger appeals the new trial order, raising four points. We deny two without extended discussion 2 and take up Point III, which challenges the grant of a new trial for error in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. John Munson Morris Margaret Morris v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Hallmark Cards v. Janet MurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. Walton v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marmaduke v. CBL & Associates Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. PHILIP H. BERGER v. EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, SCROLL COMPRESSORS LLC, and GEORGE SVARANOWIC, Defendants-Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Hale v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API