PHILIP H. BERGER v. COPELAND CORPORATION, LLC
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.
Assessing damages at $5 million actual and $23 million punitive, jurors found for Philip Berger against his employer Copeland Corporation on workplace liability claims for exposure to contaminated metalworking fluids. 1 Upon Copeland’s motion, the trial court ordered a new trial “because this Court erred in submitting Instructions 6 and 10,” respectively a negligence verdict director and a non-MAI inference instruction.
Berger appeals the new trial order, raising four points. We deny two without extended discussion 2 and take up Point III, which challenges the grant of a new trial for error in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- John Munson Morris Margaret Morris v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Hallmark Cards v. Janet MurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Walton v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marmaduke v. CBL & Associates Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- PHILIP H. BERGER v. EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, SCROLL COMPRESSORS LLC, and GEORGE SVARANOWIC, Defendants-Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hale v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017