New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought by se'veral railroads to enjoin an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, entered pursuant to a report 1 published in 313 I.C.C. 23, directing them to cancel substantial rate reductions for 66 listed movements of their trailer-on-flat-car (TOFC) service between points in the East and Texas. Two water carriers, Sea-Land Service, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Sea-Land), and Seatrain Lines, Inc. (hereinafter Seatrain), protested. the proposed rates and appeared herein to defend the order below. The United States and the Interstate Commerce…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Anchor Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas E. Payne, Individually and Representing the Metropolitan Citizens Advisory Council v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit Company, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, Thomas E. Payne v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payne v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- New York Central Railroad Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.