Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Casper v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 2, 1993No. 92-408Published

1ConcurrenceHabhab, Judge

(specially concurring).

While I agree with the majority’s result, I write separately to expound on my interpretation of Iowa Code section 321J.11 (1991) and how it affects the right to an independent chemical test in the context of a prosecution in a criminal trial for operating while intoxicated.

Iowa Code section 321J.11 describes how samples are to be taken for the purpose of determining alcohol concentration or the presence of drugs. Since these samples are used in both criminal prosecutions for operating while intoxicated and in administrative proceedings for license revocations, section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. CadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Westendorf v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Heidemann v. SweitzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. City of Blaine v. SuessWashington Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API