Wilhelm v. Young
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DICKENSON, Justice.
This venue appeal involves subdivisions 9 (trespass), 14 (land) and 29a (two or more defendants: necessary parties) of Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1995 (Vernon 1964).
Plaintiffs, J. A. Wilhelm and wife, Louise Wilhelm, sued two defendants who are not parties to this appeal 1 and Allen Young, 2 the defendant whose plea of privi lege was sustained by the trial court after a nonjury hearing. Plaintiffs appeal the order dated June 3, 1981, which sustained Young’s plea of privilege. 3 We affirm.
Plaintiffs have only briefed one point of error, arguing that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Banks v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geochem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996
- McGoldrick v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BroachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Wilhelm v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ortiz v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.