Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Young

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1981No. 5666PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKENSON, Justice.

This venue appeal involves subdivisions 9 (trespass), 14 (land) and 29a (two or more defendants: necessary parties) of Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1995 (Vernon 1964).

Plaintiffs, J. A. Wilhelm and wife, Louise Wilhelm, sued two defendants who are not parties to this appeal 1 and Allen Young, 2 the defendant whose plea of privi lege was sustained by the trial court after a nonjury hearing. Plaintiffs appeal the order dated June 3, 1981, which sustained Young’s plea of privilege. 3 We affirm.

Plaintiffs have only briefed one point of error, arguing that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Banks v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geochem Tech Corp. v. Verseckes, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996
  2. McGoldrick v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. BroachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Wilhelm v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Ortiz v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API